EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the President of the Court of 31 July 1980. # Maria Grazia Carbognani and Marisa Coda Zabetta v Commission of the European Communities. # Joined cases 161/80 and 162/80 R.

ECLI:EU:C:1980:203

61980CO0161

July 31, 1980
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61980O0161

European Court reports 1980 Page 02655

Parties

IN JOINED CASES 161 AND 162/80 R

MARIA GRAZIA CARBOGNANI AND MARISA CODA ZABETTA , OFFICIALS OF THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES EMPLOYED AT THE INFORMATION OFFICE , ROME , REPRESENTED BY BLANCHE MOUTRIER , OF THE LUXEMBOURG BAR , RESIDING AT 11A AVENUE DE LA PORTE-NEUVE , LUXEMBOURG ,

APPLICANTS ,

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY JORN PIPKORN , A MEMBER OF ITS LEGAL DEPARTMENT , ACTING AS AGENT , ASSISTED BY DANIEL JACOB , OF THE BRUSSELS BAR , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF ITS LEGAL ADVISER , MARIO CERVINO , JEAN MONNET BUILDING ,

DEFENDANT ,

Subject of the case

APPLICATION TO SUSPEND THE OPERATION OF DECISIONS BY WHICH THE COMMISSION ORDERED THE APPLICANTS TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE ROME OFFICE TO THE BRUSSELS OFFICE ,

Grounds

11 IT APPEARS UNNECESSARY AT THIS STAGE TO ADJUDICATE ON THE APPLICATIONS FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES . WHATEVER DESCRIPTION IS TO BE APPLIED IN REGARD TO ARTICLE 90 ( 2 ) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS TO THE LETTERS OF 17 DECEMBER 1979 AND THE SIMULTANEOUS PUBLICATION OF AN INVITATION FOR APPLICATIONS , IT IS NEVERTHELESS CLEAR FROM THE STATEMENTS MADE BY THE COMMISSION IN ITS WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS AND CONFIRMED DURING THE ORAL PROCEDURE THAT THE COMMISSION DOES NOT INTEND TO TAKE ANY ACTION ON THE INTENTION EVINCED IN THE SAID LETTERS UNTIL IT HAS ADOPTED FORMAL ' ' RE-ASSIGNMENT DECISIONS ' ' WITH REGARD TO THE APPLICANTS , AND IT IS AGREED THAT SUCH DECISIONS WILL ALLOW A REASONABLE PERIOD FOR THEIR IMPLEMENTATION , THUS ENABLING THE APPLICANTS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE RIGHT UNDER THE STAFF REGULATIONS TO LODGE A COMPLAINT AND MAKE AN APPLICATION TO THE COURT .

12 IT IS THEREFORE SUFFICIENT TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF THE COMMISSION ' S STATEMENTS AND TO DECLARE THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE APPLICATIONS FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES HAS FOR THE MOMENT BEEN ACHIEVED INASMUCH AS THE APPLICANTS MAY BE ASSURED THAT UNTIL THE COMMISSION MAKES A SUBSEQUENT DECISION IN WHATEVER FORM IT DECIDES UPON , THE LETTERS OF 17 DECEMBER 1979 WILL NOT BE FOLLOWED BY POSITIVE ACTION . IT FOLLOWS THEREFORE THAT THE APPLICATIONS FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES HAVE LOST THEIR PURPOSE .

Operative part

ON THOSE GROUNDS ,

THE JUDGE ACTING AS PRESIDENT OF THE COURT IN PURSUANCE OF ARTICLE 96 ( 1 ), THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 85 AND THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE

HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :

2 . COSTS ARE RESERVED .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia