EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-93/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Neoperl AG (Appeal – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 4 – Signs of which an EU trade mark may consist – Application for registration of a tactile position mark representing a cylindrical sanitary insert – Article 7 – Absolute grounds for refusal – Obligation to examine at the outset the ground for refusal laid down in Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 – None – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 72(3) – Power of the General Court to alter the decision of the Board of Appeal – Limits)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0093

62023CA0093

January 23, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/1511

(Case C-93/23 P)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 4 - Signs of which an EU trade mark may consist - Application for registration of a tactile position mark representing a cylindrical sanitary insert - Article 7 - Absolute grounds for refusal - Obligation to examine at the outset the ground for refusal laid down in Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 - None - Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 72(3) - Power of the General Court to alter the decision of the Board of Appeal - Limits)

(C/2025/1511)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Hanf, T. Klee and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Neoperl AG (represented by: C. Mertzlufft-Paufler, M. Nielen and C. Schrempp, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 7 December 2022, Neoperl v EUIPO (Representation of a cylindrical sanitary insert) (T-487/21, EU:T:2022:780);

2.Refers Case T-487/21 back to the General Court of the European Union;

3.Reserves the costs.

(1) OJ C 296, 21.8.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1511/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia