I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 4 - Signs of which an EU trade mark may consist - Application for registration of a tactile position mark representing a cylindrical sanitary insert - Article 7 - Absolute grounds for refusal - Obligation to examine at the outset the ground for refusal laid down in Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 - None - Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 72(3) - Power of the General Court to alter the decision of the Board of Appeal - Limits)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Hanf, T. Klee and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Neoperl AG (represented by: C. Mertzlufft-Paufler, M. Nielen and C. Schrempp, Rechtsanwälte)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 7 December 2022, Neoperl v EUIPO (Representation of a cylindrical sanitary insert) (T-487/21, EU:T:2022:780);
2.Refers Case T-487/21 back to the General Court of the European Union;
3.Reserves the costs.
—
(1) OJ C 296, 21.8.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1511/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—