I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2024/7040)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Lavrentios Lavrentiadis (Athens, Greece) (represented by: E. Tsakiri, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dalli-Werke GmbH & Co. KG (Stolberg, Germany)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark DALL – Application for registration No 18 687 172
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 August 2024 in Case R 2552/2023-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reject the opposition in its entirety;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs relating to the present proceedings and those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal; in the alternative, if the other party before the Board of Appeal intervenes, order EUIPO and the intervener to jointly and severally pay the costs.
—Infringement of 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of various provisions of EU law requiring manufacturers to indicate the commercial origin or their products and clearly distinguish among product categories.