EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-548/19: Action brought on 6 August 2019 – Riginos Emporiki kai Mesitiki v EUIPO – Honda Motor (ONDA 1962)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0548

62019TN0548

August 6, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

7.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/14

(Case T-548/19)

(2019/C 337/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Riginos Emporiki kai Mesitiki AE (Glyfada, Greece) (represented by: V. Oikonomidis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Honda Motor Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark in colours white, black and blue ONDA 1962 – Application for registration No 15 419 559

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 May 2019 in Case R 2384/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

set aside the contested decision in its entirety, so that the appeal is upheld and the opposition is entirely rejected;

order that the defendant bears all costs arising from or relevant to the proceedings before the Opposition Division, the Board of Appeal and present proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia