- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-913/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku (Poland) lodged on 13 December 2019 – CNP spółka z o.o. v Gefion Insurance A/S
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0913
62019CN0913
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.2.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 54/45
—
(Case C-913/19)
(2020/C 54/49)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: CNP spółka z o.o.
Defendant: Gefion Insurance A/S
Questions referred
1.Should Article 13(2), in conjunction with Article 10, of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) be interpreted as meaning that, in a dispute between a trader and an insurance company, the former having acquired from an injured party a claim arising from civil liability insurance against that insurance company, the establishment of court jurisdiction on the basis of Article 7(2) or Article 7(5) of the regulation is not precluded?
2.If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, should Article 7(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters be interpreted as meaning that a commercial company operating in a Member State which adjusts losses under compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles pursuant to a contract with an insurance undertaking established in another Member State is a branch, agency or other establishment of that insurance undertaking?
3.If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, should Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters be interpreted as meaning that it constitutes an independent basis for the jurisdiction of the court of the Member State in which the harmful event occurred, before which court the creditor who has acquired the claim from the injured party under compulsory insurance against civil liability brings an action against an insurance undertaking established in another Member State?
—
Language of the case: Polish
(1) OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.