- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-148/25: Action brought on 5 March 2025 – Ryanair v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0148
62025TN0148
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/2104
(Case T-148/25)
(C/2025/2104)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, B. Byrne, S. Rating, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the European Commission Decision (EU) of 9 September 2024 on State aid SA.43260 (2018/C) implemented by Germany in favour of Flughafen Frankfurt Hahn GmbH and Ryanair DAC (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) insofar as it finds that unlawful and incompatible State aid was granted to Ryanair, and
—order the European Commission to pay the costs related to the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the Decision violates Articles 41 and 52 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission violated the limitation period for the recovery of State aid and failed to discharge its burden of proof and/or failed to provide adequate reasoning.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission committed manifest errors of assessment of the renewability and profitability of the 2005 Marketing Agreement when applying the Market Economy Investor Test.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission committed a manifest error of assessment of the indirect beneficiary of the 2017 Marketing Agreement, i.e. Frankfurt Hahn Airport, based on an incomplete assessment of the relevant facts.
5.Fifth plea in law, alleging that the Commission disregarded the Land Rheinland Pfalz and Frankfurt Hahn Airport’s actual need for the marketing services, and the resultant satisfaction of the Market Economy Purchaser Test.
6.Sixth plea in law alleging that the Commission committed a manifest error of assessment of the amount of alleged State aid.
Commission Decision (EU) 2024/3021 of 9 September 2024 on the measures SA.43260 (2018/C) implemented by Germany in favour of Flughafen Frankfurt-Hahn GmbH and Ryanair DAC (OJ L, 2024/3021).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2104/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—