I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Series C
6.11.2023
(C/2023/544)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Applicant: Hamster Polska sp. z o.o. (Rybnik, Poland) (represented by: A. Szczurek, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Budotechnika sp. z o.o. (Pilchowice, Poland)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design Public toilet No 1 653 676 0002
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 August 2023 in Case R 3/2023 3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision or amend it by declaring the contested design No 1 653 676 0002 invalid;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant before the EUIPO Board of Appeal;
—order the intervener to bear its own costs incurred in the proceedings before EUIPO and the General Court of the European Union.
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4 to 9, 53(1) and 63 of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 5, 6 and 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4, 6, 53(1), and 63 of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/544/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
Language of the case: Polish