I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2013/C 55/35
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Coppenrath-Verlag GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany) (represented by: D. Pohl, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sembella GmbH (Timelkam, Austria)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 October 2012 in Case R 1681/2011-2;
—Order OHIM to pay the costs including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Rebella’ for goods in Classes 20 and 24 — Community trade mark application No 8 498 735
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Sembella GmbH
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘Sembella’ for goods in Classes 17, 20 and 22
Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed and the application was accordingly rejected
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 and infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009