I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 245/20
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Victor International GmbH (Elmshorn, Germany) (represented by: R. Kaase and J. Plate, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gregorio Ovejero Jiménez and María Luisa Cristina Becerra Guibert (Alicante, Spain)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 January 2014 in Case R 2208/2012-2 insofar as the opposition was upheld;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings;
—Order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before the OHIM.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘VICTOR’ for goods and services in Classes 25, 28 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 8 4 09 963
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Gregorio Ovejero Jiménez and María Luisa Cristina Becerra Guibert
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Several national figurative marks containing the word element ‘Victoria’ for goods and services in Classes 25 and 35
Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially upheld the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially annulled the contested decision
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 in combination with Article 42(2) and (4) of Regulation No 207/2009 and Rule 22(3) and (4) of the Regulation No 2868/95; infringement of Article 15(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.