I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Compliance with the time limits laid down in Articles 90 and 91 of the Staff Regulations - Request for review of a decision which has become final - No substantial new fact - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/4050)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: DR (represented by: N. Flandin, lawyer)
Defendant: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (represented by: A. Terstegen-Verhaag and C. Coucke, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) of 31 October 2023 rejecting his claim for compensation for the damage which he claimed to have suffered as a result of EIOPA’s unlawful conduct and, in so far as necessary, of the decision of 24 May 2024 rejecting his complaint, and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material damage which he claims to have suffered as a result of that unlawful conduct.
The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
DR shall pay the costs.
—
(1)
OJ C, C/2024/6108, 21.10.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4050/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—