- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-134/22: Order of the General Court of 26 September 2022 — OO v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance reduced by half — Salary statement — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0134
62022TB0134
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.12.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 463/52
(Case T-134/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - EIB staff - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance reduced by half - Salary statement - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 463/76)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: OO (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and J. Pawlowicz, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
By her action under Article 270 TFEU and under Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks annulment of the notice of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 27 February 2012, in so far as that notice grants her an expatriation allowance reduced by half.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.OO shall bear the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.