- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-368/24: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – EO v Parliament (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Article 2(c) of the CEOS – Termination of the contract – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Obligation to state reasons – Article 3 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Misuse of power or abuse of process – Presumption of innocence – Right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of proportionality – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability – Material and non-material harm)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TA0368
62024TA0368
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/4046
28.7.2025
(Case T-368/24)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 2(c) of the CEOS - Termination of the contract - Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Obligation to state reasons - Article 3 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Misuse of power or abuse of process - Presumption of innocence - Right to be heard - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of proportionality - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Liability - Material and non-material harm)
(C/2025/4046)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: EO (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr, I. Lázaro Betancor and K. Zejdová, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 15 September 2023 by which the European Parliament terminated his contract as a member of the temporary staff and, second, compensation for the material and non-material harm he claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders EO to pay the costs.
—
(1)
OJ C C/2024/5827, 7.10.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4046/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—