- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-367/19: Order of the General Court of 24 November 2020 — Camerin v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Deductions from a retirement pension — Enforcement of a decision of a national court — No need to adjudicate — Liability — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0367(01)
62019TB0367(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.1.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 28/49
(Case T-367/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Deductions from a retirement pension - Enforcement of a decision of a national court - No need to adjudicate - Liability - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 28/75)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Laure Camerin (Bastia, France) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment in part of the decision of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the Commission of 17 April 2019 regarding the enforcement of a garnishee order issued by a Belgian court, in so far as the PMO reserves the right to deduct from pension payments that the applicant is yet to receive additional amounts within the limits set by Belgian law and, second, compensation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment in part of the decision of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the European Commission of 17 April 2019 regarding the enforcement of a garnishee order.
2.The claim for damages is dismissed as inadmissible.
3.Ms Laure Camerin shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.