I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-299/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - European Parliament - Member of the temporary staff in the service of a political group - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 7 - Transfer - Article 12 and Article 12a(3) - Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ - Failure to assign tasks - Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union - Request for assistance - Loss or harm - Compensation)
(2022/C 284/11)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: EM (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, avocate)
Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha, L. Darie and C. González Argüelles, acting as Agents)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 3 March 2021, EM v Parliament (T-599/19, not published, EU:T:2021:111), to the extent that the General Court rejected the claims for compensation in the action, in so far as they sought reparation for the loss or harm suffered by the appellant as a result of being prevented from carrying out tasks during the period from 8 December 2016 to 1 June 2018, the date of his retirement;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;
3.Orders the European Parliament to pay compensation in the amount of EUR 7 500 to EM;
4.Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs in relation both to the proceedings at first instance in Case T-599/19 and the appeal proceedings and to pay half of the costs incurred by EM in relation to those proceedings.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.