EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-299/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022 — EM v European Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — European Parliament — Member of the temporary staff in the service of a political group — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 7 — Transfer — Article 12 and Article 12a(3) — Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ — Failure to assign tasks — Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union — Request for assistance — Loss or harm — Compensation)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0299

62021CA0299

June 2, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

25.7.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/11

(Case C-299/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Civil service - European Parliament - Member of the temporary staff in the service of a political group - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 7 - Transfer - Article 12 and Article 12a(3) - Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ - Failure to assign tasks - Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union - Request for assistance - Loss or harm - Compensation)

(2022/C 284/11)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: EM (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha, L. Darie and C. González Argüelles, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 3 March 2021, EM v Parliament (T-599/19, not published, EU:T:2021:111), to the extent that the General Court rejected the claims for compensation in the action, in so far as they sought reparation for the loss or harm suffered by the appellant as a result of being prevented from carrying out tasks during the period from 8 December 2016 to 1 June 2018, the date of his retirement;

2.Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;

3.Orders the European Parliament to pay compensation in the amount of EUR 7 500 to EM;

4.Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs in relation both to the proceedings at first instance in Case T-599/19 and the appeal proceedings and to pay half of the costs incurred by EM in relation to those proceedings.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia