- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-288/20: Action brought on 13 May 2020 — Brillux and Daw v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0288
62020TN0288
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.7.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 222/39
(Case T-288/20)
(2020/C 222/43)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: Brillux GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany) and Daw SE (Ober-Ramstadt, Germany) (represented by: R. van der Hout, C. Wagner and V. Lemonnier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217, (1) in so far as it concerns the classification and labelling of titanium dioxide;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on nine pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-279/20, CWS Powder Coatings v Commission.
(1) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 of 4 October 2019 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures and correcting that Regulation (OJ 2020 L 44, p. 1).