- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-117/23: Action brought on 3 March 2023 — Kantstraße Paris Bar v EUIPO — Superstudio21 (Bar Paris)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0117
62023TN0117
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/21
(Case T-117/23)
(2023/C 134/29)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Kantstraße Paris Bar GmBH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt and A. Wulff, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Superstudio21 GmbH (Cologne, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark Bar Paris — Application for registration No 18 088 718
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 December 2022 in Case R 299/2022-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.