- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-2/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 4 January 2019 — A.P. v Riigiprokuratuur
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0002
62019CN0002
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.3.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 93/34
(Case C-2/19)
(2019/C 93/44)
Language of the case: Estonian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: A.P.
Respondent: Riigiprokuratuur
Question referred
Is the recognition and supervision of execution of a judgment of a Member State compatible with Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA (1) of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions even where the sentenced person has by that judgment been conditionally released without any additional obligations being imposed, so that the person’s only obligation is to avoid committing a new intentional offence during the probation period (this being a suspended sentence within the meaning of Paragraph 73 of the Estonian Criminal Code)?
Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions (OJ 2008 L 337, p. 102).
* * *