EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-612/15: Action brought on 2 November 2015 — Basic Net v OHIM (Representation of three vertical stripes)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0612

62015TN0612

November 2, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

11.1.2016

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/31

(Case T-612/15)

(2016/C 007/41)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Basic Net SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: D. Sindico, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark ‘Representation of three vertical stripes’ — Application for registration No 12 880 481

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 August 2015 in Case R 2845/2014-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

principally:

alter the contested decision on the basis of the arguments, contained in the present application in conjunction with the evidence and documents adduced in the first two stages of the proceedings and, without referring the case back, grant the application for registration No 12 880 481, on the ground that the contested decision must be regarded as flawed for breach, first, of the rules laid down in Articles 7(1)(b) and 75 of Regulation No 207/2009, or, second, of the rules laid down in Article 7(3) of that regulation.

In the alternative:

annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal;

determine the amount of the costs of the proceedings to be borne by OHIM.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009;

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia