- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-209/22: Action brought on 19 April 2022 — Makhlouf v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0209
62022TN0209
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 237/62
(Case T-209/22)
(2022/C 237/80)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Shahla Makhlouf (Fairfax, Virginia, United States) (represented by: G. Karouni and K. Assogba, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should
—annul, in so far as those acts concern the applicant,
—Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/242 of 21 February 2022 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria and its Annex I;
—Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/237 of 21 February 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and its Annex II;
—order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 30 000 in damages to compensate all forms of loss;
—under Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the unsuccessful party is ordered to pay the costs. Ms Shahla Makhlouf requests that the Council be ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by her, of which supporting evidence can be shown during the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law which are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-206/22, Makhlouf v Council.