- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-664/17: Action brought on 27 September 2017 — eSlovensko v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0664
62017TN0664
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.12.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 424/45
(Case T-664/17)
(2017/C 424/66)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: eSlovensko (Lučenec, Slovakia) (represented by: F. Branislav, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision Ref. ARES(2017)3107844-21/06/2017 of the European Commission excluding the applicant from participating in all procurement and grant award procedures governed by Regulation No 966/2012 and from the award of funds governed by Regulation 2015/323;
—order the defendant to conduct a new audit, reviewing its findings as to admissible costs;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging misuse of powers, particularly improper legal evaluation of facts and findings.
—The applicant argues that there was no reasonable basis for the Commission’s decision.
2.Second plea in law, alleging inadequate justification of the contested decision.
—The Commission evidently failed to properly and impartially review all circumstances of the case.