I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
18.3.2024
(Case T-47/23) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark WILD INSPIRED - Earlier EU word mark INSPIRED - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity of the services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/2023)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Miłosz Jeleń (Kamionka Wielka, Poland) (represented by: M. Bac-Matuszewska, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: The Animal Store, Food and Accessories, SL (Valencia, Spain)
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 December 2022 (Case R 1299/2022-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2023/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)