- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-381/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien (Austria) lodged on 29 July 2010 — Astrid Preissl KEG v Landeshauptmann von Wien
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CN0381
62010CN0381
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 274/12
(Case C-381/10)
()
2010/C 274/18
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Astrid Preissl KEG
Respondent: Landeshauptmann von Wien
Questions referred
1.Should the requirement in point 4 of Chapter I of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 that ‘[a]n adequate number of washbasins is to be available … with hot and cold running water’ be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘Handwaschbecken’ used in the German language version is to be understood as any hand washing facility (connected to a hot water supply), or only as a washbasin which is used exclusively for hand-washing?
2.What are the criteria for determining whether the hygiene requirements laid down in point 4 of Chapter 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004, as expressed with the words ‘materials for cleaning hands and for hygienic drying’, are met? Should that provision of the Annex be interpreted as meaning, for example, that a hand dryer or a water tap only meets the hygiene requirements of point 4 of Chapter I of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 if the hand dryer or water tap can be used without touching by hand?
Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs; OJ 2004 L 139, p. 1.