- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-349/21, HYA and Others (Grounds for authorising telephone tapping): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — HYA, IP, DD, ZI, SS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Telecommunications sector — Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy — Directive 2002/58/EC — Article 15(1) — Restriction of the confidentiality of electronic communications — Judicial decision authorising the interception, recording and storage of telephone conversations of persons suspected of having committed a serious intentional offence — Practice whereby the decision is drawn up in accordance with a pre-drafted template text that does not contain individualised reasons — Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0349
62021CA0349
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.4.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 127/6
(Case C-349/21, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) HYA and Others (Grounds for authorising telephone tapping))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Telecommunications sector - Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy - Directive 2002/58/EC - Article 15(1) - Restriction of the confidentiality of electronic communications - Judicial decision authorising the interception, recording and storage of telephone conversations of persons suspected of having committed a serious intentional offence - Practice whereby the decision is drawn up in accordance with a pre-drafted template text that does not contain individualised reasons - Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Obligation to state reasons)
(2023/C 127/07)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: HYA, IP, DD, ZI, SS
Other party to the proceedings: Spetsializirana prokuratura
Operative part of the judgment
Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) read in the light of the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
is to be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude a national practice under which judicial decisions authorising the use of special investigative methods, following a reasoned and detailed application from the criminal authorities, are drawn up by means of a pre-drafted text which does not contain individualised reasons, but which merely states, in addition to the validity period of the authorisation, that the requirements laid down by the legislation to which those decisions refer have been complied with, provided that the precise reasons why the court with jurisdiction considered that the legal requirements had been complied with, in the light of the factual and legal circumstances characterising the case in question, can be easily and unambiguously inferred from a cross-reading of the decision and the application for authorisation, the latter of which must be made accessible, after the authorisation has been given, to the person against whom the use of special investigative methods has been authorised.
*
Language of the case: Bulgarian
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140