- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-552/08P P: Order of the Court of 1 October 2009 — Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Customs Code — Article 220(2)(b) — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Waiver of subsequent entry in the accounts of import duties — Notice to importers — Good faith)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008CB0552
62008CB0552
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.1.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 11/11
(Case C-552/08P P)
(Appeal - Customs Code - Article 220(2)(b) - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Waiver of subsequent entry in the accounts of import duties - Notice to importers - Good faith)
2010/C 11/19
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH (represented by: O. Wenzlaff, Rechtsanwält)
Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Schønberg, agent and B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwält)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2008 in Case T-51/07 Agrar-Invest-Tatschl v Commission, by which the Court dismissed the action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C (2006) 5789 final of 4 December 2006 finding that post-clearance recovery of a part of the import duty not demanded from the applicant in respect of the import of sugar from Croatia should be effected — Good faith of the person liable to duty precluded if the Commission has published a notice to importers — Incorrect assessment of the effect which the subsequent confirmation of the authenticity and accuracy of the certificates of origin by the customs authorities of the State of export has on the criterion of good faith
Operative part of the order
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal.
2.Orders Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.