- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-669/18: Action brought on 13 November 2018 — Neoperl v EUIPO (Representation of four filled-in holes in a regular hole pattern)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0669
62018TN0669
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.1.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 25/50
(Case T-669/18)
(2019/C 25/64)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Neoperl AG (Reinach, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Börjes-Pestalozza, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Mark at issue: Application for an EU position mark (Representation of four filled-in holes in a regular hole pattern) — Application No 16 259 665
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2018 in Case R 2059/2017-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.