- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-711/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 25 September 2019 — Admiral Sportwetten GmbH and Others
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0711
62019CN0711
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 406/18
(Case C-711/19)
(2019/C 406/25)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Admiral Sportwetten GmbH, Novomatic AG, AKO Gastronomiebetriebs GmbH
Defendant: Magistrat der Stadt Wien
Questions referred
1.Is Article 1 of Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the provisions of the Vienna Betting Terminal Duty Law which provide for taxation of the operation of betting terminals are to be assessed as ‘technical regulations’ within the meaning of that provision?
2.Does the failure to notify the provisions of the Vienna Betting Terminal Duty Law within the meaning of Directive (EU) 2015/1535 mean that a duty such as the betting terminal duty may not be levied?
(1) OJ 2015, L 241, p. 1.