- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-53/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 July 2015 — WR (*) v Commission (Civil service — Remuneration — Family allowances — Dependent child allowance — Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Person treated as a dependent child — Person whom the official has a legal responsibility to maintain and whose maintenance involves heavy expenditure — Conditions for granting — Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance — Recovery of overpayments under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FA0053
62014FA0053
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Case F-53/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 July 2015 — (*1) v Commission (Civil service — Remuneration — Family allowances — Dependent child allowance — Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Person treated as a dependent child — Person whom the official has a legal responsibility to maintain and whose maintenance involves heavy expenditure — Conditions for granting — Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance — Recovery of overpayments under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations)
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 July 2015 — (*1) v Commission
(Case F-53/14) (1)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: (*1) (represented by: V. Simeons, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T.S. Bohr and A.-C. Simon)
Re:
Annulment of the decisions withdrawing the dependent person allowance granted to the applicant in respect of her mother and cover by the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European institutions (JSIS) and annulment of the decisions to recover the sums overpaid.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Declares that (*1) is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
Information erased within the framework of the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data.
(1) OJ C 421, 24.11.2014, p. 58.
ECLI:EU:C:2015:140