- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-240/19: Action brought on 9 April 2019 — A9.com v EUIPO (Device of a bell icon)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0240
62019TN0240
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 213/56
(Case T-240/19)
(2019/C 213/55)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: A9.com, Inc. (Palo Alto, California, United States) (represented by: A. Klett and C. Mikyska, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark (Representation of device of a bell icon — Application for registration No 17 868 712)
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2019 in Case R 1309/2018-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that:
—The Court annuls the contested decision.
—The respondent must pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and the proceedings before the Board of Appeal including the necessary expenses of Applicant in both proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Articles 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.