- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-847/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2021 — Achemos Grupė UAB, Achema AB v European Commission, Republic of Lithuania, Klaipėdos Nafta AB (Appeal — State aid — Decision not to raise any objections — Article 108 TFUE — Rights of the interested parties — Principle of sound administration — Diligent and impartial investigation — Scope of the review by the General Court — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0847
62019CA0847
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.7.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 278/10
(Case C-847/19 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - State aid - Decision not to raise any objections - Article 108 TFUE - Rights of the interested parties - Principle of sound administration - Diligent and impartial investigation - Scope of the review by the General Court - Obligation to state reasons)
(2021/C 278/12)
Language of the case: English
Appellants: Achemos Grupė UAB, Achema AB (represented by: R. Martens and V. Ostrovskis, advokatas)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by É. Gippini Fournier, N. Kuplewatzky and L. Armati, acting as Agents, and subsequently by E. Gippini Fournier, A. Bouchagiar and L. Armati, acting as Agents), Republic of Lithuania (represented by: R. Dzikovič and K. Dieninis, acting as Agents), Klaipėdos Nafta AB (represented by: K. Kačerauskas, and V. Vaitkutė Pavan, advokatai)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the main appeal;
2.Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the cross-appeal;
3.Orders Achemos Grupė UAB and Achema AB to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in respect of the main appeal;
4.Orders Achemos Grupė UAB, Achema AB and the European Commission to bear their own costs in respect of the cross-appeal;
5.Orders the Republic of Lithuania and Klaipėdos Nafta AB to bear their own costs in respect of both the main appeal and the cross-appeal.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140