EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-807/23, Jones Day: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – Katharina Plavec v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 45 TFEU – Lawyers – Lawyer training – Territorial restrictions – National legislation requiring the completion of part of the training period of a trainee lawyer with a lawyer having his or her registered office in the national territory)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0807

62023CA0807

April 3, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3021

10.6.2025

(Case C-807/23,

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for workers - Article 45 TFEU - Lawyers - Lawyer training - Territorial restrictions - National legislation requiring the completion of part of the training period of a trainee lawyer with a lawyer having his or her registered office in the national territory)

(C/2025/3021)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Katharina Plavec

Defendant: Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which requires a specific part of practical training, which is necessary in order to be admitted to practise as a lawyer and during which the trainee lawyer has some power to act as a legal representative before the courts of that Member State, to be completed with a lawyer established in that Member State, while precluding the possibility of that part being completed with a lawyer established in another Member State, even though that lawyer is admitted in the first Member State and the activities carried out in the context of that training relate to the law of that first Member State, and therefore not allowing the persons who have studied law concerned to complete that part of that training period in another Member State on the condition that they prove to the competent national authorities that that part of the training as will be completed by him or her is capable of providing them with training and experience equivalent to that provided by practical training with a lawyer established in the first Member State.

(1) OJ C C/2024/2409.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3021/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia