EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-521/06 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 July 2008 — Athinaïki Techniki AE v Commission of the European Communities, Athens Resort Casino AE Symmetochon (Appeal — State aid — Aid granted by the Hellenic Republic to the Hyatt Regency consortium — Complaint — Decision to take no further action on the complaint — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Articles 4, 13 and 20 — Concept of act open to challenge for the purposes of Article 230 EC)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006CA0521

62006CA0521

January 1, 2006
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/10

(Case C-521/06 P)

(Appeal - State aid - Aid granted by the Hellenic Republic to the Hyatt Regency consortium - Complaint - Decision to take no further action on the complaint - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Articles 4, 13 and 20 - Concept of ‘act open to challenge’ for the purposes of Article 230 EC)

(2008/C 223/15)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Athinaïki Techniki AE (represented by: S. A. Pappas, dikigoros)

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, Agent), Athens Resort Casino AE Symmetochon (represented by: F. Carlin, Barrister, and N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 26 September 2006 in Case T-94/05 Athinaïki Techniki AE v Commission, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible the action seeking annulment of the Commission's letter of 2 December 2004 informing the then applicant that no further action would be taken in regard to its complaint alleging that State aid had been granted by the Hellenic Republic in the context of a public contract tendering procedure — Concept of an act open to challenge for the purposes of Article 230 EC

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the order of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 26 September 2006 in Case T-94/05 Athinaïki Techniki v Commission.

2.Rejects the preliminary plea of inadmissibility raised by the Commission of the European Communities before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities.

3.Refers the case back to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities for it to rule on the pleas in law of Athinaïki Techniki AE, seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 2 June 2004 to take no further action concerning State aid allegedly granted by the Hellenic Republic to the Hyatt Regency consortium in the disposal of 49 % of the capital of the Casino Mont Parnès.

4.Orders that the costs be reserved.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia