EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-44/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 8 October 2008 — Barbin v European Parliament (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — Procedure for the allocation of merit points in the European Parliament — Illegality of the instructions governing that procedure — Examination of comparative merits)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007FA0044

62007FA0044

January 1, 2007
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Tenth Chamber)

6 December 2008

(Case C 313/56)

(Case F-44/07) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - Procedure for the allocation of merit points in the European Parliament - Illegality of the instructions governing that procedure - Examination of comparative merits)

(2008/C 313/101)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Florence Barbin (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and R. Ignătescu, later by C. Burgos, A. Lukošiūtė and R. Ignătescu, agents)

Re:

First, annulment of the decision of 16 September 2006 to allocate one merit point to the applicant under the 2005 promotion procedure and, secondly, for a declaration that paragraph I.2(c) of the ‘Implementing measures relating to the allocation of merit and promotion points’ of the European Parliament of 10 May 2006 is illegal.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.dismisses the application;

2.orders the parties to bear their own costs.

* * *

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 155 of 7.7.2007, p. 45.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia