EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-281/22, GK and Others (European Public Prosecutor’s Office): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — Criminal proceedings against G.K., B.O.D. GmbH, S.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 — Article 31 — Cross-border investigations — Judicial authorisation — Scope of the review — Article 32 — Enforcement of assigned measures)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0281

62022CA0281

January 1, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1375

(Case C-281/22, (1) GK and Others (European Public Prosecutor’s Office))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Article 31 - Cross-border investigations - Judicial authorisation - Scope of the review - Article 32 - Enforcement of assigned measures)

(C/2024/1375)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Intervening party: Österreichischer Delegierter Europäischer Staatsanwalt

Operative part

Articles 31 and 32 of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’)

must be interpreted as meaning that the review conducted in the Member State of the assisting European Delegated Prosecutor, where an assigned investigation measure requires judicial authorisation in accordance with the law of that Member State, may relate only to matters concerning the enforcement of that measure, to the exclusion of matters concerning the justification and adoption of that measure; the latter matters must be subject to prior judicial review in the Member State of the handling European Delegated Prosecutor in the event of serious interference with the rights of the person concerned guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 318, 22.8.2022

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1375/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia