- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-769/14: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2015 — CGI Luxembourg and Intrasoft International v Parliament (Action for annulment and for damages — Public service contracts — Development and maintenance of production information systems — Ranking of a tenderer in the cascade procedure — Annulment of the contested decisions — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TB0769
62014TB0769
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.9.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 320/29
(Case T-769/14)(Action for annulment and for damages - Public service contracts - Development and maintenance of production information systems - Ranking of a tenderer in the cascade procedure - Annulment of the contested decisions - No need to adjudicate)
(2015/C 320/45)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: CGI Luxembourg SA (Bertrange, Luxembourg); and Intrasoft International SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: B. Simon and L. Darie, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for, first, annulment of the Parliament’s decisions to rank the applicants’ tender second in the cascade for the purposes of awarding the contract in respect of Lot 3, ‘Development and maintenance of production information systems’, in the open call for tenders PE/ITEC/ITS14, ‘External Provision of IT Services’, and to award the first cascading contract in that tendering procedure to another consortium and, secondly, the award of damages.
Operative part of the order
1)There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.
2)The parties shall bear their own costs, including those incurred in connection with the interim proceedings.
Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.