I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2023/C 121/17)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: DDP Specialty Electronics Materials US 8 llc (Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States) (represented by: G. Gibbons, SC, R. Minch and A. Bateman, Solicitors)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Taniobis GmbH (Goslar, Germany)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark AMBERTEC — Application for registration No 18 104 742
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 November 2022 in Case R 1988/2021-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and/or the intervener (if appropriate) to pay the applicant’s costs including the costs incurred before the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of Articles 94(1) and 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights including the principle of equality of arms, the right to a fair trial and the applicant’s defence rights;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.