I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeal – Customs code – External Community transit operation – Remission of import duties – Conditions – Compliance with time‑limits – Compliance with the rights of the defence – Principle of proportionality – Notion of manifest negligence – Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part
3. Appeals – Grounds – Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal – Inadmissible (see para. 74)
6. Appeals – Grounds – Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, para. 1) (see paras 95-96, 105, 115, 119, 131, 142, 148, 158, 171)
8. Appeals – Grounds – Plea directed against the decision of the Court of First Instance on costs – Inadmissible where all other pleas dismissed (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, para. 2) (see para. 174)
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 13 September 2005 in Case T-53/02 Ricosmos v Commission, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the application for annulment of Commission Decision REM 09/00 of 16 November 2001 informing the Netherlands authorities that there were no grounds for remission of import duties in respect of a consignment of cigarettes intended for the Czech Republic on the ground that fraud committed by third parties in the course of an external Community transit operation does not constitute a special situation justifying remission of the import duties.
The appeal is dismissed.
Ricosmos BV is ordered to pay the costs.