EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-294/25, Ryanair DAC: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 April 2025 – Ryanair DAC v VT

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0294

62025TN0294

April 15, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/3544

7.7.2025

(Case T-294/25, Ryanair DAC)

(C/2025/3544)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Ryanair Designated Activity Company

Respondent: VT

Questions referred

Must the operating air carrier, in order to be exempted from liability, prove that it took ‘all reasonable measures’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) by

providing for a ‘minimum reserve time’ for each of the previous flights operated by the same aircraft, when organising a series of flights with the same aircraft, or

can the concept of a ‘reasonable measure’ be interpreted as providing for a ‘minimum reserve time’ of a duration specified by way of guidance, or is the duration to be determined according to the circumstances of the specific case?

When determining the total duration of the delayed operation (more than three hours), assuming that ‘extraordinary circumstances’ of a certain duration are present, is the minimum reserve time (which has been determined with the aid of a duration specified by way of guidance or determined specifically according to the circumstances) to be deducted?

Is it necessary to prove that, in the light of the capacities of the undertaking at the relevant time, it was not possible to operate the flight – even with a replacement aircraft other than the one planned – where the ‘slots’ are set in advance by Eurocontrol in accordance with a timetable?

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3544/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia