- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-440/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 2 August 2013 — Croce Amica One Italia Srl v Azienda Regionale Emergenza Urgenza (AREU)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0440
62013CN0440
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.11.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 344/39
(Case C-440/13)
2013/C 344/68
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Croce Amica One Italia Srl
Defendant: Azienda Regionale Emergenza Urgenza (AREU)
Questions referred
1.Is it consistent with Community law for it to be permissible for a contracting authority, in the exercise of its power to withdraw a decision in relation to a public procurement procedure pursuant to Article 21d of Law No 241/1990, to decide not to proceed with the final award of the contract merely because criminal investigations are pending vis-à-vis the legal representative of the company to which the provisional award was made?
2.Is it consistent with Community law for there to be a derogation from the principle of the finality of findings of criminal liability, as expressed in Article 45 of Directive 2004/18/EC, on grounds of administrative expediency, relating to an area of administrative autonomy?
3.Is it consistent with Community law for there to be a derogation from the principle of the finality of findings of criminal liability, as expressed in Article 45 of Directive 2004/18/EC, where pending criminal investigations concern offences relating to the tendering procedure covered by the administrative decision adopted by way of self-protection?
4.Is it consistent with Community law for the decisions adopted by a contracting authority in matters of public procurement to be open to unlimited review by a national administrative court, in exercise of the jurisdiction conferred in matters relating to public procurement, covering the reliability and the suitability of the tender, and thus going above and beyond the limited cases of clear absurdity, irrationality, failure to state adequate reasons or error as to the facts?
Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114).