I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2008/C 22/91)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Bodegas Montebello, S.A. (Montilla, Spain) (represented by: T. Andrade Boué, M.I. Lehmann Novo, and A. Hernández Lehmann, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Montebello (limited company) (Guadalupe, France)
—annulment of OHIM's decision of 7 September 2007 in Case R 223/2007-2;
—rejection of Community trade mark No 2.666.386;
—order OHIM to pay the costs including those of the intervener.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Montebello (limited company)
Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark ‘MONTEBELLO Rhum Agricole’ (application No 2.266.386) for goods in Class 33 (alcoholic beverages, except beers).
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish word mark ‘MONTEBELLO’ (No 1.148.196) for goods in Class 33.
Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: decision of the Opposition Division upheld and annulled.
Pleas in law: Misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.