I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 107/24)
Language of the case: Spanish
Appellant: El Corte Inglés, S.A. (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2014 in Case T-515/12 in its entirety;
—order the party or parties opposing this appeal to pay the costs.
1.The first ground of appeal is based on distortion of the facts, in that the General Court, in its judgment of 15 October 2014, categorised the conceptual similarity between the signs as low, whereas the Board of Appeal of OHIM took the view that there is conceptual similarity.
2.The second ground of appeal is based on infringement of Community law, in that Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 (1) was applied incorrectly.
3.The third ground of appeal is based on infringement of Community law, in that Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 was applied incorrectly.
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).