- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-424/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Portigon v SRB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0424
62020TN0424
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 279/55
(Case T-424/20)
(2020/C 279/70)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Portigon AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: D. Bliesener, V. Jungkind und F. Geber, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the defendant’s decision of 15 April 2020 on the calculation of contributions to the Single Resolution Fund collected in advance for 2020 (SRB/ESF/2020/24), in so far as the decision concerns the applicant;
—stay the proceedings under Article 69(c) and (d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court until a final decision is issued in Cases T-420/17, T-413/18, T-481/19 and T-339/20 or until those cases are otherwise brought to a conclusion;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law, which are essentially identical or similar to the first, second, third, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth plea in law put forward in Case T-339/20, Portigon v SRB.