- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-224/09: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — CEVA v Commission (Action for annulment — Specific programme for research and technological development on energy, environment and sustainable development — Protop project — Subsidy contract — Demand for recovery of payments made on account pursuant to a contract for the financing of research — Sub-contracting — Enforcement order — Act not subject to review — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TB0224
62009TB0224
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.11.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 331/20
(Case T-224/09)(1)
(Action for annulment - Specific programme for research and technological development on energy, environment and sustainable development - Protop project - Subsidy contract - Demand for recovery of payments made on account pursuant to a contract for the financing of research - Sub-contracting - Enforcement order - Act not subject to review - Inadmissibility)
2011/C 331/38
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) (Pleubian, France) (represented by: J.-M. Peyrical, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Joris, Agent, assisted by E. Bouttier, lawyer)
Re:
Annulment of the enforcement order decision adopted by the Commission on 6 April 2009 by which the Commission called upon the applicant to refund all the payments made on account within the framework of a subsidy contract relating to a research project falling within the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration on ‘Energy, environment and sustainable development’.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.The Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) is ordered to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 205, 29.8.2009.