I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2017/C 424/68)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Turbo-K International Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Norris, A. Muir Wood, Barristers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Turbo-K Ltd (Winchester, United Kingdom)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘TURBO-K’ — Application for registration No 13 458 039
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 July 2017 in Case R 2135/2016-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and reject the objections to the registration of the mark in their entirety;
—order the payment of the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with this appeal.
—Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.