I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-521/22, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) Konštrukta — Defence)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ - Appellate body of a national supervisory authority for public procurement procedures - Independence - Status of a third party in relation to the authority which adopted the contested decision - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(2023/C 155/29)
Language of the case: Slovak
Applicant: KONŠTRUKTA — Defence a.s.
Defendant: Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Rada Úradu pre verejné obstarávanie (Council of the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority, Slovakia), by decision of 3 August 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.
Date lodged: 4.8.2022.
* * *
Language of the case: Slovak.
* * *