I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-495/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure - Directive 89/665/EEC - Public procurement - National legislation - Fees for access to administrative proceedings in the field of public procurement - Right to an effective remedy - Dissuasive fees - Judicial review of administrative decisions - Principles of effectiveness and equivalence))
(2016/C 270/12)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicants: Antonio Tita, Alessandra Carlin, Piero Constantini
Defendants: Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dell’Economia e della Finanze, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Segretario Generale del Tribunale Regionale di Giustizia Amministrativa di Trento (TRGA)
Article 1 of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007, and the principles of equivalence and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation requiring the payment of court fees, such as the standard fee at issue in the main proceedings, when proceedings are brought in the public procurement field before the administrative courts.
*
Language of the case: Italian.
ECLI:EU:C:2016:270
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.