- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-214/19: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2020 — Fleximed v EUIPO — docPrice (Fleximed) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Fleximed — Earlier EU word mark mediFLEX — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0214
62019TB0214
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.4.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 114/9
(Case T-214/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Fleximed - Earlier EU word mark mediFLEX - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2020/C 114/08)
Language of the proceedings: German
Parties
Applicant: Fleximed AG (Triesen, Liechtenstein) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek and A. Söder, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: docPrice GmbH (Koblenz, Germany)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 February 2019 (case R 1121/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between docPrice and Fleximed.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
2.Fleximed AG is ordered to pay the costs.
(*)
OJ C 182, 27.5.2019