- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-509/23: Action brought on 21 August 2023 — Giorgio Armani v EUIPO — Shenzhen City Chongzheng Technology (Representation of a stylised eagle)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0509
62023TN0509
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2023/35
(Case T-509/23)
(C/2023/35)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Giorgio Armani SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: I. Carli, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Shenzhen City Chongzheng Technology Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark (Representation of a stylised eagle) — Application for registration No 18 365 053
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 June 2023 in Case R 1413/2022-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings, if it joins as intervener, to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/35/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)