I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-598/16)(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Assignment - Transfer in the interest of the service - Reassignment of the applicant - Implementation of a judgment - Pre-litigation procedure - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)
(2017/C 112/52)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Nikolaos Pipiliagkas (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)
Application based on Articles 266 TFEU and 270 TFEU for annulment, first, of the Commission’s decision not to adopt the measures for compliance with the judgment of 15 April 2015, Pipiliagkas v Commission (F-96/13, EU:F:2015:29), and, secondly, of the Commission’s decision of 22 December 2015 reassigning the applicant from the European Union delegation to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, to the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport.
1.The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.
2.Mr Nikolaos Pipiliagkas shall pay the costs.
Language of the case: French.
* * *
(1) OJ C 296, 16.8.2016 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-28/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).