- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-352/25: Action brought on 30 May 2025 – WM v EIB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0352
62025TN0352
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/4180
4.8.2025
(Case T-352/25)
(C/2025/4180)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: WM (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Investment Bank
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the loss of chance resulting from the 30 September 2024 non-renewal of his contract;
—order material damage to be assessed following the delivery of an interlocutory judgment;
—order the defendant to compensate the applicant’s moral prejudice which can be evaluated, ex aequo et bono, at EUR 60 000;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in support of the illegality of the non-renewal decision:
1.First plea in law, alleging some manifest errors of assessment.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty of care, of the principle of non-discrimination and of the duty to provide reasonable accommodation as well as misuse of power.
The applicant then exposes his prejudice and the link of causality between his prejudice and the illegality of the non-renewal decision.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4180/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—