EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-58/11: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — Nolin v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Withdrawal of merit points and priority points following a promotion on the basis of Article 29 of the Staff Regulations — Legal basis — Competence of the author of the act — Principle of non-discrimination)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0058

62011TA0058

November 15, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

7.1.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/15

(Case T-58/11)(1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Withdrawal of merit points and priority points following a promotion on the basis of Article 29 of the Staff Regulations - Legal basis - Competence of the author of the act - Principle of non-discrimination)

2012/C 6/27

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Michel Nolin (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agent, and D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 1 December 2010, delivered in Case F-82/09 Nolin v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the setting aside of that judgment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders Mr Michel Nolin to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the appeal.

(1)

OJ C 89, 19.3.2011.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia